Music mogul Sean “Diddy” Combs has come under intense scrutiny following allegations surrounding his so-called “Freak Off” sex parties.
A source involved in organizing these events, recently revealed to the meticulous and controversial standards imposed on female guests for these gatherings, held during 2004 and 2005.
According to the organizer, Diddy had exacting preferences for the appearance of women attending these parties. A scale was reportedly kept on hand, ensuring that no guest weighed more than 140 pounds unless they were exceptionally tall.
“The girls had to be young and hot,” the organizer said. “No flab, no cellulite, not overly pierced or tattooed, and definitely no short hair.”
Attire was strictly regulated as well: “No pants, no jeans, no flat shoes. Every girl had to wear a party dress, ideally very short, just enough to cover her butt cheeks but not longer than mid-thigh.
Cleavage was a must, and everyone had to wear stilettos. That was non-negotiable.”
However, one thing that was not checked was age, according to the organizer. “It was a ‘don’t ask, don’t tell’ situation,” she added, noting that she herself was young at the time and thought the lack of questions about age was due to alcohol laws.
A dancer hired for Diddy’s 2005 MTV Video Music Awards afterparty, she said she was initially paid $250 to dance but was offered an additional $1,000 to perform privately at Diddy’s house later.
“It felt shady, so I didn’t go,” said the dancer, who was just 20 years old at the time. She recalled that other women did attend but later remained tight-lipped about the events that unfolded.
Two videos are reportedly tied to high-profile events like the VMAs or the Super Bowl and show scenes of women fitting the described physical criteria engaging in sexual acts, with Diddy appearing to watch from the background.
In one clip, he seems to be participating, holding the camera himself while apparently engaging in a sexual act.
These allegations of misconduct come on the heels of similar claims in recent lawsuits.
In one such case, a woman accused Diddy and a female celebrity of sexually assaulting her when she was only 13 years old after the 2000 VMAs.
The accusations have extended further, with Texas-based attorney Tony Buzbee announcing additional cases against Diddy, including one from an alleged victim who was just 9 years old.
Diddy has strongly denied all allegations of wrongdoing. His attorneys issued a statement rejecting the claims and expressing confidence that the truth would emerge in court, maintaining, “Mr. Combs has never sexually assaulted anyone — adult or minor, man or woman.”
Federal authorities intensified their investigation in March, when they raided two of Diddy’s residences and reportedly seized a significant quantity of sex-related materials, including hundreds of videos and a substantial amount of paraphernalia.
The U.S. Attorney’s Office suggested that some of these recorded encounters might not have been consensual, raising further questions about the true nature of the “Freak Off” events.
Documents related to the case allege that Diddy’s mistreatment of women extended beyond the parties themselves. According to federal charges, women were allegedly coerced into days-long sexual activities, sometimes with male sex workers who were transported across state lines.
These events, termed “Freak Offs,” were purportedly orchestrated, directed, and often filmed by Diddy.
The documents claim he exercised control over his victims by various means, including physical intimidation and manipulation, along with the financial and career leverage he held over them.
Authorities further allege that Diddy’s influence extended beyond financial dependency, stating that he also leveraged access to narcotics to maintain control.
“To ensure participation in the Freak Offs, Combs used violence and intimidation, exploiting his financial support to them and threatening to cut off the same, as well as controlling their careers,” officials asserted.
These assertions underscore the nature of the charges he faces, including racketeering conspiracy, sex trafficking, and transportation across state lines for the purpose of prostitution.
Currently, Diddy is defending himself on multiple fronts, facing both criminal charges and a series of civil suits filed by alleged victims.
He has pleaded not guilty to all charges, maintaining that any activities were consensual and refuting the allegations of coercion and abuse.
In the face of mounting public scrutiny, Diddy’s legal team continues to insist on his innocence, asserting that, in time, they believe the legal process will clear his name.
The musician and entrepreneur now faces not only the legal repercussions of these allegations but also the significant impact these claims have had on his public image and career.